<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talking to yourself on the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.macobserver.com/userfriendly/2008/04/29/talking-to-yourself-on-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.macobserver.com/userfriendly/2008/04/29/talking-to-yourself-on-the-web/</link>
	<description>Ted Landau is the founder of MacFixIt.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tomoy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.macobserver.com/userfriendly/2008/04/29/talking-to-yourself-on-the-web/#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>tomoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.macobserver.com/userfriendly/2008/04/29/talking-to-yourself-on-the-web/#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>So many words to read.  So many opinions.  Thoughtful well-informed ones like this are treasures though.  FWIW, I follow Ted, and have ever since about 1996 commiserating over a particularly bad 1710av monitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many words to read.  So many opinions.  Thoughtful well-informed ones like this are treasures though.  FWIW, I follow Ted, and have ever since about 1996 commiserating over a particularly bad 1710av monitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YellowBirdMan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.macobserver.com/userfriendly/2008/04/29/talking-to-yourself-on-the-web/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>YellowBirdMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.macobserver.com/userfriendly/2008/04/29/talking-to-yourself-on-the-web/#comment-850</guid>
		<description>Well, as you can see, I too have a blog. I'm lucky if I get more than a couple (and I really do mean 2) hits to the blog each day. And, that's just hits, I'm not even talking about people actually reading what I've written.

On the one hand it's frustrating having practically zero readership as one of my goals is to actually entertain people. On the other, writing out one's thoughts and having an actual place for them to go that's not a dusty old notebook hidden on a shelf is, at times, therapeutic.

As for comments, I also leave them at other sites. Though those sites are usually very very specific. The comments I leave that beg for discussion are usually at sites wherein that is the culture, such as The Joy of Tech. Otherwise, I expect nothing.

The information overload issue is not that there is so much information, the problem is that it is so easily accessible. It's exceptionally easy to read an article at one site and spend hours link hopping.

On the other hand, as Keith Weintraub pointed out above, I too have researched many topics that I otherwise would not have without the Internet and WWW. I also utilize information available online for most, if not all, of my purchasing decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as you can see, I too have a blog. I&#8217;m lucky if I get more than a couple (and I really do mean 2) hits to the blog each day. And, that&#8217;s just hits, I&#8217;m not even talking about people actually reading what I&#8217;ve written.</p>
<p>On the one hand it&#8217;s frustrating having practically zero readership as one of my goals is to actually entertain people. On the other, writing out one&#8217;s thoughts and having an actual place for them to go that&#8217;s not a dusty old notebook hidden on a shelf is, at times, therapeutic.</p>
<p>As for comments, I also leave them at other sites. Though those sites are usually very very specific. The comments I leave that beg for discussion are usually at sites wherein that is the culture, such as The Joy of Tech. Otherwise, I expect nothing.</p>
<p>The information overload issue is not that there is so much information, the problem is that it is so easily accessible. It&#8217;s exceptionally easy to read an article at one site and spend hours link hopping.</p>
<p>On the other hand, as Keith Weintraub pointed out above, I too have researched many topics that I otherwise would not have without the Internet and <a href="http://WWW" rel="nofollow">http://WWW</a>. I also utilize information available online for most, if not all, of my purchasing decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leeg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.macobserver.com/userfriendly/2008/04/29/talking-to-yourself-on-the-web/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>leeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.macobserver.com/userfriendly/2008/04/29/talking-to-yourself-on-the-web/#comment-849</guid>
		<description>@Keith Weintraub: I agree 100%.

The comment I wanted to make in reply to Ted's post is that this is entirely similar to the Unboxing phenomenon, where Apple commentators are in such a rush to get the first review of the new product that they'll take a photo of the thing while it's still in the box.  People want to make sure that their opinion is heard and is heard early, and the web allows that; research is a slow and tedious process which gets in the way of posting.

P.S. First!!!?! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Keith Weintraub: I agree 100%.</p>
<p>The comment I wanted to make in reply to Ted&#8217;s post is that this is entirely similar to the Unboxing phenomenon, where Apple commentators are in such a rush to get the first review of the new product that they&#8217;ll take a photo of the thing while it&#8217;s still in the box.  People want to make sure that their opinion is heard and is heard early, and the web allows that; research is a slow and tedious process which gets in the way of posting.</p>
<p>P.S. First!!!?! <img src='http://blogs.macobserver.com/userfriendly/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Weintraub</title>
		<link>http://blogs.macobserver.com/userfriendly/2008/04/29/talking-to-yourself-on-the-web/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Weintraub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.macobserver.com/userfriendly/2008/04/29/talking-to-yourself-on-the-web/#comment-848</guid>
		<description>Two things:

- A lot of what is out there is duplicated. I get a few different tech and business RSS feeds and invariably many the articles cover the same exact ground.

- I think that for a given topic that I might be interested in I actually read a greater percentage of the "total knowledge available" on that topic than I would have otherwise. That's because info on the internet is easier to retrieve than it would be in the Library of Congress for example.

Some topics that I probably never would have explored except for the internet: Scientology, Mormonism, The Norman Conquest, Tolkien, Chomsky, Genome.

All in the last 6 months or so.

All of these were looked at for a few hours each. Not as deep as reading a few texts but much deeper than I would have otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things:</p>
<p>- A lot of what is out there is duplicated. I get a few different tech and business RSS feeds and invariably many the articles cover the same exact ground.</p>
<p>- I think that for a given topic that I might be interested in I actually read a greater percentage of the &#8220;total knowledge available&#8221; on that topic than I would have otherwise. That&#8217;s because info on the internet is easier to retrieve than it would be in the Library of Congress for example.</p>
<p>Some topics that I probably never would have explored except for the internet: Scientology, Mormonism, The Norman Conquest, Tolkien, Chomsky, Genome.</p>
<p>All in the last 6 months or so.</p>
<p>All of these were looked at for a few hours each. Not as deep as reading a few texts but much deeper than I would have otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.macobserver.com/userfriendly/2008/04/29/talking-to-yourself-on-the-web/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.macobserver.com/userfriendly/2008/04/29/talking-to-yourself-on-the-web/#comment-846</guid>
		<description>Well I do wholeheartedly agree. I've tried to start numerous blogs with very little 'success' as it were. and it just feels like there's no real way to stand out amongst the endless ranks of writers, 99% of which offer only self-info and a lot of unedited grammar.

Speaking of how comforting to know that an article has been edited for style and accuracy, you wrote "One one side..." on that penultimate paragraph...:) &lt;em&gt;{now fixed}&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I do wholeheartedly agree. I&#8217;ve tried to start numerous blogs with very little &#8217;success&#8217; as it were. and it just feels like there&#8217;s no real way to stand out amongst the endless ranks of writers, 99% of which offer only self-info and a lot of unedited grammar.</p>
<p>Speaking of how comforting to know that an article has been edited for style and accuracy, you wrote &#8220;One one side&#8230;&#8221; on that penultimate paragraph&#8230;:) <em>{now fixed}</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
